Supreme law resolutely prevent the use of criminal intervention in economic disputes – Sohu news mi.11bt.info

The Supreme Law: resolutely prevent the use of criminal means to intervene in economic disputes – Sohu Beijing News reporter Zhang Ni photo 29, the highest law released on the strengthening of property rights two opinions of judicial protection, stressed the need to strictly distinguish between economic disputes and criminal crimes, and resolutely prevent the economic disputes when doing a crime. Strict distinction between personal property and family members involved in the property, the crime involved in handling the case shall not be implicated in the legitimate property of their family members. The strict distinction between the economic dispute and crime 29, the Supreme People’s court held a press conference to introduce "the Supreme People’s Court on giving full play to trial functions and strengthen the judicial protection of IPR in the opinion" and "the Supreme People’s Court on the main contents of the law and properly handle the history of the formation of the property case work to implement the views of" and answered questions from reporters. The "Supreme People’s Court on giving full play to trial functions and strengthen the judicial protection of IPR views" clearly, we must strictly distinguish between economic disputes and criminal crimes, and resolutely prevent the economic disputes as a crime. "Opinions" stressed the need to fully consider the characteristics of the non-public economy, strictly grasp the standard of criminal crime, limits strict distinction between legitimate and illegal fund-raising, financing contract dispute and contract fraud, private enterprises involved in economic disputes and malicious in the merger and reorganization of state-owned enterprises occupy state-owned assets, and resolutely prevent the economic disputes as a criminal offence and resolutely prevent the use of criminal means to intervene in economic disputes. In accordance with the law with seizure, seizure and freeze etc. in addition, the "opinions" clearly, according to the law with coercive measures and seizure, seizure, freezing measures, to minimize the adverse impact on the enterprise normal production and operation activities. Enterprises and personnel involved in the case, should be taken into account the nature of the act, the degree of harm and the attitude of cooperation with the case, according to the law carefully decide whether the application of coercive measures and seizure, seizure, freezing measures. In the criminal trial, the defendant has been arrested, with bail, monitoring living conditions, should change coercive measures. In criminal, civil and administrative trial, to be taken to seal up, seizure, freezing measures, in addition to the law shall be ordered to shut down businesses, where conditions permit, for enterprises to provide necessary liquidity and current account. No seizure, seizure or freezing of property unrelated to the case. Strict distinction between the personal property and family members of the property involved in the Opinions also stipulates that to strictly regulate the disposal of property involved, according to the law to protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises and personnel involved. The strict distinction between illegal income and legal property, for after the hearing can not confirm the illegal income, shall not be demanded or ordered to return the judgment. In addition, we should strictly distinguish between personal property and corporate property, processing shareholders, business managers and other natural person crime may not be any legal property involved enterprises, processing enterprises crime shall be arbitrarily implicated shareholders, managers of individual legal property. To strictly distinguish between the personal property of the person involved and the family members of the property, the crime involved in handling the case shall not be implicated in the legitimate property of their family members. (end)相关的主题文章: