Wuwei man shouldn’t there be some applause tonight – Sohu news mp7a1

Wuwei man: shouldn’t there be some applause tonight? The Sohu news, it’s said that no one is looking at the public signs near the spring festival. You must be familiar with the background of "Gansu Wuwei reporter" event when you click on Changan Jun (WeChat ID:changanjwj). Let’s get to the point. In January 7th, 3 journalists, such as the Lanzhou morning post in Gansu correspondent’s station in Wuwei, were traced to "lost contact". After a public letter appeared like "new Express", "please release", the reporter Zhang Yongsheng became famous overnight. Although Wuwei Public Security Bureau Liangzhou branch announced "lost contact" reason is: Zhang reporter was arrested for prostitution and administrative detention, 3 reporters repeatedly extortion others property. But few believe it’s a simple law enforcement. In particular, Zhang also wrote a number of negative reports on the Wuwei public security system". But the thing is happening, instant opinion fryer. From the normal logic, prostitution, extortion are common violations, put on an ordinary person, even the county newspaper can not be estimated. But with the "journalist" two words hooked, there will be the power of deep sea bombs. Changan Jun was concerned about the Sina micro-blog, almost one-sided ecology of public opinion is: "Wuwei public security, this is not a private revenge, what is it?"" At that time, if let Changan Jun to Wuwei public security and onlookers small partners design a dialogue, must be like this: "Wuwei Public Security Bureau Liangshan branch:" I hold a law, why so much saliva? God is vexed" "Little partner:" look at the black history of the journalists in Wuwei, and blame me?" It is fair to say that Wuwei can not be blamed for its journalists. What kind of thing did Wuwei do? A widely circulated posts "Gansu Wuwei, a reporter let up mighty place", summed up in place: the psychological foundation of God like this, no wonder everyone on the "Wuwei caught reporters" incident taut nerves. Times are different. In 1988, you can collect newspapers in Wuwei, but you can’t mess with journalists in 2016. Unconvinced? Under the network public opinion field, "everyone is a reporter"". The real journalist is considered to be the person standing on the mast of the time ship; the news supervision power is the effective and direct means of exercising the right to criticize and suggest. Now, because do not want to hear my words, then blindfolded my eyes on this wonderful thing, not even in the Internet, in a moment, don’t burst into the "universally condemned" thing, do you think I still Hellokitty? Later, the Gansu Provincial People’s Procuratorate stepped into the investigation. On that day, Changan Jun into Paracel Islands in "life is the heart of the sea" for U.S. warships, a look at today the results of the investigation, I rub, actually each with my will. First look at the results of the survey – Changan Jun unexpected three points: first, the new year, and even Changan Jun into mixed eating and sleeping mode. The most recent popular saying is "there is a kind of sweet delay called after years", but the Gansu prosecutors’ involvement in the investigation also has the sincerity of the northwest people With 35 people, a week to tackle key issues, Taobao owners prepare for "double 11" but that’s the case.

武威放人:难道今夜不应该有一些掌声?-搜狐新闻  据说临近过年,都没人看公号了。点开长安君(微信ID:changanjwj)这篇评论的你,一定已经很熟悉“甘肃武威抓记者”事件的来龙去脉。   那咱们直入主题。   1月7日,甘肃驻武威记者站的《兰州晨报》等3名记者被曝“失联”,在一封形似《新快报》“请放人”版的公开信曝光之后,记者张永生一夜成名。尽管武威市公安局凉州分局公布的“失联”原因是:张记者涉嫌卖淫嫖娼被行政拘留,3名记者还多次敲诈勒索他人财物。但几乎没人相信,这是一起单纯的执法。尤其是,张记者还曾写过多篇针对武威公安系统的“负面报道”。 但事情就是发生了,瞬间舆论炸锅。   从正常逻辑看,嫖娼、敲诈勒索都属于寻常违法,放在一个普通人身上,估计连县级报纸都上不了。但跟 “记者” 二字挂上钩,就有了深海炸弹般的威力。长安君当时关注了一下新浪微博,几乎一边倒的舆论生态是:“武威公安这不是挟私报复是什么,昂?” 当时,如果让长安君给武威公安和围观小伙伴设计一段对话,想必是这样:   “武威公安局凉山分局:‘我就执个法为啥那么多口水?神烦。’”   “小伙伴:‘看看你武威抓记者的黑历史,怪我咯?’”   公允地说,武威抓记者事件,真不能怪网民苛刻。看看武威曾干过什么奇葩事?一篇广为流传的网帖《甘肃武威,一个让记者威武不起来的地方》,总结得神到位:   有这样的心理基础,难怪大家对“武威抓记者”事件绷紧神经。时代不同了,1988年你武威能收缴报纸,2016年却不能乱抓记者。不服气?网络舆论场下,“人人都是记者”。而真正的记者,更被认为是站在时代航船桅杆之上的人;新闻监督权,更是你我行使批评、建议权的有效和直接手段。现在,因为不爱听我的话,就把我的“眼睛”蒙上了,这种奇葩事没遇上互联网也就算了,遇上了,不瞬间爆发成“千夫所指”之事,你以为我还是当年的Hellokitty?   后来,甘肃省人民检察官介入调查了。那天,长安君在为美舰闯入西沙群岛“地命海心”,今天一看调查结果,我擦,居然每条都跟我想的不一样。 先来看看调查结果――    出乎长安君意料的有三点:   一是快过年了,连长安君都进入混吃等睡模式。最近一句特别流行的话叫“有一种甜蜜的拖延叫年后再说”,但甘肃检察这次介入调查,也太有西北人的诚意了吧?居然用35个人、一周时间来攻关,淘宝店主备战“双11”不过如此了(吐舌头)?结果公布也没犯“春节拖延症”,其实按照经验,隔个春节、吐槽完春晚,好多人都忘了;再拖一拖,讲真,不公布也没几个人记得了……   二是这次调查的“阵容”有点猛。本来,武威一个区公安局的行政行为,合法与否,动用省级第三方来调查,已经属于“高规格配置”,可信度还是增加了不止一点点的(虽然长安君依然怀疑有“官官相护”嫌疑);但甘肃省检察院这次,居然还让律师、记者、企业界和教育界的人士对核查工作进行了全程监督。这是种什么精神?是明知调查结果可能被疑“公检法是家人”,而主动迎“槽点”而上的精神。也算是开了先河,结果暂且不论,勇气还算可嘉。   三是甘肃省公安厅决定,武威市公安局撤销对张记者处罚的行政决定,对责任人停职处理并依法追究过错。对张记者将启动国家行政赔偿。咦,没按套路来?按照经验,难道不该是上级公安局铺陈各种理由,表示自己的小兄弟“抓得对”吗?“打脸”属于费力不讨好,撒谎属于不费力不讨好,选择不护犊、愿查服输,也算条汉子。   接下来,长安君要集中吐槽了――为什么这次诚意满满的调查结果,没有平息舆论质疑?   一梳理就发现,舆论质疑主要是下面三个:“七年记者才勒索5000块,你在逗我么?”“张永生被抓,与他此前的舆论监督究竟有没有关系?”“调查过程不公开,说再多也没用!” 这些质疑都有道理,但也有误区。   比如,张永生是因嫖娼被抓,结果嫖娼证据不足,又变成了敲诈勒索,原因是“对张永生涉嫌嫖娼留置盘问过程中,发现张永生系2016年1月4日武威市公安局批转的举报信中的被举报人,遂就举报信反映的敲诈勒索问题同步进行盘问”。那5000块钱,是所有的敲诈勒索嫌疑款吗?不是。调查结论说得很明白,是“事实清楚、证据确凿、本人供认不讳、有各种证据佐证”的5000块钱。   长安君请教了警察朋友,他的说法是:太正常了。   在侦查、提起公诉、乃至在庭审之中,被告人都处在无罪的地位。而且,如果在事实认定过程中,如果证据存有疑点,(或是证据实体上的瑕疵,或是证据收集程序上存在瑕疵),那么这条证据就不能作为认定案件事实来使用。证据只能认定敲诈勒索的金额在5000元,即使所有人都不能相信,但是证据只能证明犯罪金额是5000元,就只能认定是5000元。这就是“疑罪从无”在案件审理中的运用。   第二个质疑,是关于张记者被抓,是不是有关部门挟私报复?这点质疑没有回应,舆论难平。但从警察办案的角度看,长安君的警察朋友也坦诚相告:“办案中,警察只管一个人违法犯罪的部分,至于他舆论监督,不属违法犯罪,警方无权发言。”当然,这种“纯业务出发”的思维是否还适用于当下的舆论场?值得讨论。长安君也呼吁在可能的情况下,警方对公众期待的细节,有更多回应。但这至少说明一点:调查结果没涉及“舆论监督”四个字,不代表警方就一定心中有鬼。(还是希望你多公开啊警察蜀黍!!!)   第三个质疑,调查过程应该更公开,长安君也同意。有人建议,调查中提到警方发现有针对张记者的“举报信”,那么可否把举报信亮出来?但是很遗憾,依照法律,警方有义务替举报人保守秘密。司法规律和舆论期待之间,不太可能完全吻合。但长安君认为,在可能的情况下,二者应该也必须找到一个平衡点。武威事件的调查结果尽管不够完美,但已经迈出了一步,我们更应该做的是一码归一码,该肯定肯定,该质疑质疑。而不是无原则地赞成或反对。   最后,长安君还想说:真相还有待进一步逼近,但是绝对有调查和等待的价值。我们任何一个人,都不应在真相公布之前,提前以自己的思维定势去妄自设置定论――恕长安君提醒,目前的网络舆论场,正有这类“刻板印象”流行的趋势:记者被抓,就以为一定是记者无辜,结果曾为陈永洲高呼“请放人”的新快报却被事实打脸;小贩控诉,就一定认为小贩柔弱,结果发现小贩拿水果猛砸警察在先;药家鑫案,就一定认为药家有“权钱黑幕”,结果发现药父其实并不是官员……   不得不承认,很多时候,事实往往出乎民意的想象。最终决定一件事谁对谁错的,并不是民意,而是真相。如果我们忘记了这一点,“喊打喊杀”的网络戾气就不会偃旗息鼓。任何公共事件中,争议的各方将比谁的音量大、水军多,而不是谁手握科学、真实可信的证据。在一个依法治国、信仰法律、理性有序的公民社会中,尤其如此。   真相只有一个,请信仰真相的力量,它不因为你的讨厌或者喜欢而改变。真相只有一个,请信仰真相的力量,它将守护着你在最“人微言轻”的时刻,也可以面对最庞大的民意巨浪而维护住自己的合法权益。真相只有一个,请信仰真相的力量,它值得每一个人去尊重和守候。相关的主题文章: